Okay, I know that I posted something on Facebook the other day about doing a NCAA tournament-style bracket deciding the games based on the teams’ logos. I actually spent a little time on it and, once I really got into it, realized that many of the team logos consist either primarily or solely of letters. I guess I never really thought about that, but it’s true. Sure, there is some design element to the logos, but it’s kind of boring.

So what I am going to do is the same sort of thing, but with corporate logos which gives me a lot more to work with. There are a few different ways I can do this and I’m still sorting it out, but I’ll get it started either next week or the week after. I know this isn’t a terribly exciting post, but I wanted to mention it just so that nobody thinks I completely blew it off. Stay tuned.

I guess I don’t need to go into too much detail about what happened here over the weekend. I wasn’t in town on Saturday, but I live and work in the neighborhood and have been down there many times on Saturday nights. Generally there are a lot of people in and out of the bars as well as a number of people who are just hanging around outside. Smoking, talking, just hanging out, whatever. So, as I said, I wasn’t there on Saturday, but I’ve seen the same video that you’ve seen. A fight obviously broke out, but from the kind of crappy video, how can you tell what the hell is even going on? I can’t even tell exactly how many people are fighting. There are more people standing on the sidelines watching and some women trying to break it up.

Point one: this was not a brawl or a riot, as I’ve seen it called on a couple of media outlets. It was a fight that spilled into the street. I’ve seen the same thing at several other bars on the street. It’s a sad-but-true fact of life that people fight in bars. Why do they fight? Because sometimes it is important to show you that I am, in fact, way more awesome than you. Speaking of bar fights, there is one bar on the street (not one of the bars that plays dance music, by the way) that has had a fight 2 out of the past 3 times I’ve been in there (in the past 3–4 weeks). One of the fights even spilled out onto the sidewalk. Where is all of the hand-wringing over that fight?

Come to think of it, the last fight that I can remember that got this out of hand didn’t happen at one of the dance bars either and involved mostly white guys, if I recall correctly. And in the case of that fight, it stemmed from a wedding reception and they actually did some property damage (which Saturday night’s fight didn’t do, I don’t think). Again, where was the hand-wringing? Where were the calls to shut down wedding receptions with country music?

There weren’t any, of course. Why not? Because Saturday night’s incident involved a bunch of black guys. And that brings me to this…

Point two: It makes me sad to see the number of comments with racist undertones (and some not-so-subtle comments) regarding this fight. Not just this fight, either, but with the overall neighborhood the past few months. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard someone make a comment regarding the neighborhood “getting a little dark at night” and I’ve also heard the n-word dropped more frequently over the past few months than I’ve heard in years. I’m hearing these thoughts and worse from people who you’d be pretty surprised to hear it from.

As far as comments on Facebook and the forums on mlive.com, connectmidmichigan.com go, I don’t even know what to say. It’s embarassing how poorly educated and ignorant people are sometimes. What do you think all of those comments about Bay City turning into another Saginaw or Flint are? Do you think they’re talking about crime rate? No, that’s code for black people. One idiot even suggested (jokingly, I hope) gating the city. What a douche.

Point three: Is Midland Street dangerous? No, it’s not. Somebody asked me today if I thought it was getting more dangerous and I rejected the question because it’s not dangerous down here. There have been more fights the past five or six months, but only a couple that have gotten really out of hand. And I’ve seen more fights involving white people than anything else, but we have to make a big deal out of this one? The problem on Midland Street on Saturday night wasn’t that they were black, it’s that they were drunk. If you don’t think that’s the truth, then why wasn’t there an uproar over the wedding party fight?

Point four: The Westown is taking a lot of heat, which is not entirely fair. Westown is the only nightclub (I use the term loosely, mostly because it’s the theatre I saw Footloose in, but it’s as close as we’ve got to a real nightclub), but they are hardly the only bar playing dance/hip-hop music. And they’re not the only bar who draws a crowd which includes African-Americans. I keep reading quotes how nobody is pointing the finger, but when I see people saying that they aren’t pointing the finger? Guess whose marquee is behind them on TV? And guess whose photo they choose to run on mlive.com?

Point five: This is an issue for ALL liquor-licensed and late-night businesses. Just because you don’t play dance music doesn’t mean that you’re not part of this, too. I know that when it comes time to talk about paying for additional security, there are going to be some bar owners who are going to pitch a fit over it and try to pass it all off on Westown and maybe a couple of other establishments, but that’s a joke. I’ve heard people in other establishments making comments about the number of black people (that’s not the word they used) on the street. I’ve heard the people working in these same establishments making the same comments. And I’ve heard people make  under-their-breath, racist comments out on the street. How long until that turns into a fight? Maybe you don’t own the powder keg, but you’re handing out books of matches pretty freely.

I think the city and the liquor-license holders—all of them—have a shared responsibility here. The problem is that you can’t get the liquor license holders to agree on anything. Lots of egos in the room and lots of bickering. The bars who cater to the sports-and-a-beer crowd don’t feel they should have to pay extra because some bars have a different crowd, but the fact of the matter is that the more people who are down here, the better it is for everybody.

Point six: The city needs to do more. I know that they’re crying bankrupt, but something has to be done. On Friday and especially Saturday nights, Midland Street is the highest concentration of people in Bay City. Add in youth, add in alcohol, add in a racial mix and how can the BCPD turn a blind eye to it?

I am not an expert on city finances or anything like that, but I know that the budget is stretched way past thin. The police have a police reserve that they use for crowd control during big events. Can a combination of officers and reservists walk a beat? I think there should be a police presence late weekend nights anyway because this is a highly trafficked area at that time, so it would make sense that this is where some police should be. Maybe you have to pass on any additional cost on to the late-night businesses (I don’t know that it’s fair to pass it on to the many businesses who aren’t open at night).

It’s important to note here, that you can’t blame the police, either. In the past, some bar owners told the city (at Midland Street District meetings) that they didn’t want too heavy of a police presence here because it might scare people away.

Point seven: Kevin Novellino is a friend and I support his right to say what he wants and I genuinely understand his anger, but as a neighborhood business owner and a city commissioner, I think he had better ways to handle this without giving people the impression that Midland Street is dangerous. I share Kevin’s frustration because, like Kevin, I want our neighborhood to make everybody feel comfortable and I think it’s reckless to just put a video out there on Facebook.

There was supposed to be a meeting last week with district business people along with Kevin, the chief of police and somebody else in city management, but Kevin wasn’t able to deliver on his assurance that he’d have the chief of police and city manager there. Not only that, but he didn’t bother to show up himself. So to say that nobody is listening is pretty disingenuous.

Point eight: Finally! Something to get people all riled up about on local news! Thank goodness for the local news. Winter is still at least a few weeks away. If it weren’t for this story of danger lurking in our friendly bar district, what ever could we use to scare the citizenry. Better stock up on bread and milk, everybody, there is a band of marauding hooligans waiting to get you!

In summary: This is a problem, but it isn’t an unsolvable problem. It might not be easy to come to a solution, though, because there are so many egos involved. At some point, all of the interested parties—neighborhood businesses, property owners, representatives from the city and police—need to sit down and talk about what can be done to improve safety on the street. Whether that will happen or not is the real question. The glacial pace of progress in Bay City is really not going to do us any favors, that’s for sure.

I feel like I probably didn’t say everything that I meant to, but I do feel better after writing it. Thanks for reading.

To call the last week a whirlwind for the Gap would be an understatement. A firestorm is a little more like it. In the end, the Gap did something that is becoming increasingly common—relented to the wishes of consumers and ditched the new logo in favor of the old logo. It’s a lot to follow, so I put together a quick graphic timeline of the Gap logo.

So as you can see from the graphic above, for over 20 years the Gap had the classic Gap logo. Then last week they decided to spring a new logo on the world. The new logo, officially announced on October 8, went over about as well as the new Coke recipe back in the 80′s. People hated it and the internet was awash with critical tweets, Facebook posts and blogs (including this one).

A few days later, the Gap saw the light and killed the new logo and reverted to the original. There was actually an interesting in-between announcement when someone from the Gap (I can’t remember who and am not curious enough to look the name up) made the announcement that the new logo was just part of a process and that they loved the feedback from the public. They loved it so much, in fact, that they wanted crowdsource a new logo. Hey, everybody’s a designer! Send us your ideas for free and we’ll use it. Here’s a Gap gift card for $50. Thanks!

The only thing professional designers hate more than bad design is crowdsourcing. It completely devalues graphic design as a profession. I’ve written about it before and I probably will again, it’s just a way for companies to get something for nothing while turning design into a commodity. Naturally, the internet lit up again with protests from designers about what a stupid idea it was.

In the end, Gap made out okay from all of this. While not everybody knew about the logo change, they were one of the most hotly debated (not much of a debate, I guess, when everybody hates what you did) topics on the internet, even making their way into print and broadcast media. Suddenly, everybody was talking about the Gap. The chain received an overwhelming amount of feedback at no additional cost and were able to pull themselves back from the bring before it cost them a fortune (unlike Tropicana who took it in the wallet with their package redesign-and-reversal process). And in the end, Gap relented to popular demand, which gives people the feeling that Gap really does care about their customers.

It’s been suggested by some that this is all a PR ploy, but I don’t think so. Why not? Two reasons. First of all, if they were trying to pull something off, I think they’d come up with a better fake logo. This logo was too bad to have been done on purpose, I think. Second, the whole crowdsourcing thing. If they were being advised, that would have never come up.

I just think it was a very large company exercising very poor judgement. It happens.

Anyway, welcome back Gap logo, we hardly missed ye.

After last week’s entry about Spencer Fairey taking a little too little artistic license with another person’s image, let’s start this week off with a great example of taking someone else’s idea and doing something with it.

We’re going to start with an album that some consider to be the very first true rock-n-roll record, Elvis Presley’s self-titled debut on RCA Records. When RCA purchased the 21-year-old singer’s contract from Sun Records’ owner Sam Phillips (for $35,000) Presley had only a few singles to his hame. This 1956 album was the album that introduced him to world and launched him to the stratosphere.

Twenty-some years later, in 1979 (1980 in America), The Clash released their masterpiece, London Calling. The cover of London Calling featured a very clear tribute (or was it a thumbing of the nose?) at Presley’s cover.

And now, thirty years after the Clash’s homage to the King, New York City design studio The Chopping Block has breathed new life into the image with their robotRock t-shirt.

I can’t even begin to tell you how much I love this shirt. I’d like to recommend that everyone go out and buy one—and I really think you should—let’s just coordinate what days we’re going to wear them, cool?

I’m a big Clash fan, so the London Calling image has been a part of my consciousness for many, many years. I never realized until a while after that it was a nod back to the Elvis album. There have been many other covers, images, parodies, etc. that have borrowed from that original Elvis album, but these are a couple of the best examples around.

So what will I design that will be toyed with for the next 50 years? Hmmmm…good question.